Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Participation in CVD may allow discussions between your developers and security researchers on new tools or methods for vulnerability discovery such as static analysis or fuzzing. These tools and methods can then be evaluated for inclusion in ongoing development processes if they succeed in finding bugs and vulnerabilities in your product. Essentially, CVD can facilitate field testing of new analysis methods for finding bugs.


Panel
borderStylesolid

< 2.5. Ethical Considerations | 2.7. CVD as a Wicked Problem >

References

  1. A. Ozment and S. E. Schechter, "Milk or wine: Does software security improve with age?" in USENIX Security, 2006.
  2. K. Matsudaira, "Bad Software Architecture Is a People Problem," Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 42-43, September 2016.
  3. J. M. Wing, "A Symbiotic Relationship Between Formal Methods and Security," in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Security, Dependability and Assurance: From Needs to Solutions, 1998.
  4. E. Bobukh, "Equation of a Fuzzing Curve — Part 1/2," 18 December 2014. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/eugene_bobukh/2014/12/18/equation-of-a-fuzzing-curve-part-12/. [Accessed 23 May 2017].
  5. E. Bobukh, "Equation of a Fuzzing Curve — Part 2/2," 6 January 2015. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/eugene_bobukh/2015/01/06/equation-of-a-fuzzing-curve-part-22/. [Accessed 23 May 2017].